|Photo of a typical disciple of the cult of the “fat burning zone”.|
Day 3 of the SuppVersity Exercise Science Week and for some of you maybe about time to have breakfast… hold on, breakfast? But shouldn’t you work out before breakfast? I mean this whole cardio in the morning business you have taken up lately is all about doing it before, not after breakfast isn’t it? You grab your WIFI-connected iPhone tune in to the Super Human Radio morning cardio mash-up and hop onto your cycle ergometer, treadmill, rowing machine, elliptical, spinning bike, stepper, or whatever else you may be using – no breakfast no intra-workout supplement – at least no carbs, right? Ah, and of course you are going to work out at the highest intensity possible, to burn more fat later on, after all, you are no disciple of the cult of the “fat burning zone”, right? Right! And still you have your doubts, hah?
Now, I can’t tell you whether the above has anything to do with your morning routine. What I can tell you, however, are the long and short on 24h energy expenditure by summarizing and expanding on some of the main findings of a recent paper by Kaito Iwayama and Kumpei Tokuyama, two young scientists from the Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science at the University of Tsukuba (Iwayama. 2012).
Let’s start with the “short”, then
I guess you will be familiar with the term “metabolic chamber”. That’s a small room, where you, as a scientists, lock your subjects up in order to monitor their energy metabolism with your fancy electronic equipment and analytical methods for a prolonged period of time (usually 24h). As Iwayama and Tokuyama point out in their latest paper this technique has long been and in fact still is considered the gold standard as far as 24h energy expenditure measurements are concerned.
“During the last 10 years, experiments with this method have raised interesting observations such as: 1) exercise intensity has no effect on 24 h fat oxidation, 2) exercise has little, if any, effect on 24 h fat oxidation, and 3) exercise before breakfast increases 24 h fat oxidation.”
Just in case you are one of those guys / gals who don’t read quotations, we are going to spend the major part of today’s contribution to the SuppVersity Exercise Science Week recapping what “the short” is telling us about your morning, afternoon and/or evening efforts to lose body fat and extend it into “the long” by adding references an examples, so don’t worry.
I. Exercise intensity has no effect on 24 h fat oxidation
|If you really want to maximize fatty acid oxidation while do a HIIT session before a lengthy steady state aerobics.You should be aware though, that we are talking about relative increases, here (read more)|
We all know that the amount of energy your body consumes during physical activity will depend on the “workload”, which is defined as the mathematical product of force x way. In that, the force during a lift would be gravity g x mass of your weight. For a 10kg weight, this would yield a force of 100N[ewton], let’s say you lift that weight from the ground into a hight of 1m. In that case, the workload you applied would equal 100N x 1m = 100Nm. If you move a larger weight, say 20kg, for example you would have done twice as much work… it’s as easy as that, but unfortunately pretty useless when it is applied to the human human body. While it may still make sense to compare “work-matched” workouts with each other, the outcome in terms of the energetic demands a “10,000Nm bodybuilding workout” will produce, is very different from that of a “10,000Nm O-lifting workout”, let alone a “10,000Nm marathon run”. The relation between work and energy physicists often try to explain by stating that “(mechanical) energy is a measure of the ability to do work” is too simplistic to work (all puns intended) out in exercise physiology.
If we had a phyiscal model that described what happens in your body down to the level of the individual cell, things would be different. Currently, however, we are missing 99% of that model, so that we have to find other ways to measure the exercise induced and basal energy expenditure – and this is where the metabolic chamber comes in. It allows scientists to measure the energy expenditure independent of any workload calculations and does even allow for a quantitative estimation of where that energy is coming from, namely from fats or carbohydrates (and glyconeogensis). From previous studies, which availed themselves of this amazing piece of equipment, we know already that
- for low-intensity exercise, below 40-50% of the VO2Max the energy supplied is primarily from oxidation of plasma free fatty acids
- for intensities ranging from 50% to 95% of the VO2Max, the ratio of glucose to fatty acid oxidation, the so called respiratory rate is constantly increasing; in that, a RER of 0.8 tells us that we are fuelling 80% of our energy demands from glucose, already
- for intensities in the 100% of VO2max range, the RER approaches 1.0 meaning that our bodies satisfy almost 100% of their energetic demands by the oxidation of carbohydrates (glycogen => glucose)
This has, as we have already seen in yesterday’s 2nd post in the SuppVersity Exercise Science Week, led to the commonly held belief that low-intensity exercise would be better than high-intensity exercise for increasing fat oxidation and, thus, fat loss (Hill. 1992).
The notion that what happens after your workout is about as, if not more important than the energy, let alone fatty acid expenditure during a workout has unfortunately not reached public awareness, as of yet.
That’s a pitty, right? Well at least as far as the rate of fatty oxidation is concerned, I would not be too sure about that, as previous studies suggested that the amount of fat that’s oxidized in the post-exercise recovery period following isocaloric exercise performed at high (65% VO2max for 1 h) or moderate intensity (45% VO2 max for 86-89 min) is identical!
“First, consistent with the literature, fat oxidation during exercise was less for high-intensity exercise than for low-intensity exercise. Second, the increase in fat oxidation during the post-exercise period seemed to be greater after high-intensity exercise, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Third, the sum of fat oxidation during the exercise and post-exercise periods was not significantly different between the two exercise conditions of different intensity.” (Iwayama. 2012)
Aside from these fundamental insights, the studies on which this rationale is based on did also provide another intriguing, yet somewhat discriminating insight:
- While women have the edge as far as intra-workout fatty acid oxidation is concerned, their ability to burn fat during rest is low compared to their male counterparts (Hanerson. 2007). According to Iwayama and Tokuyama, this biological fact may also explain why women are typically less successful in achieving their fat loss goals in response to exercise only interventions than men (Ballor. 1991; Donnelly. 2005).
Now think about this for just a second, take a look at the data in figure 1 and now tell me: “What’s the best way for women to maximize fatty acid oxidation?”
Right! That’s low intensity long duration workouts. Those will allow them to burn more fat (on a relative basis) during the workout without experiencing the bump in post-exercise fatty oxidation rates Melanson et al. observed in their 2002 study. And yet, neither I nor the researchers who wrote…
“Given that time is a limiting factor for most individuals, if the goal of exercise is to maximize fat oxidation to better regulate body fat mass, then exercise should be performed at the highest intensity that can be comfortably maintained.” (Melanson: 2002)
…would recommend that our female or male readers stick to “training in the zone”, only. You will learn why this is the case later in the article. For the moment, I do yet want to address the second and third assertion from the initially cited three-item list, first.
II. Whether you exercise or not has no influence on 24h fatty acid expenditure
At first sight this sounds, bullocks. I mean, it should be out of question that you burn more fat, when you work out, than when you lie around on the couch, right? And in this case you are right – at least, if you include the additional fatty acid oxidation during the workout in your calculation and discard things like standard deviations and statistical non-significance.
And still, under “macronutrient-balanced condition[s”], which are a necessary prerequisite to measure the independent effect exercise has on 24-h fat oxidation without having a negative energy balance or the ingestion of some sugary intra-workout drinks skew the results towards higher, respectively lower rates of fatty acid oxidation (cf. Bielinski. 1985; Dionne. 1999). Exactly this is what has been done in a series of metabolic chamber experiments, Iwayama and Tokuyama reference in their paper (see table 1) to support their assertion that
“fat oxidation on days with exercise doesn’t differ from sedentary control days when the energy balance is maintained.” (Iwayama. 2012)
While the results are anonymous it’s clear that they do not support the notion that working out would exert an independent effect on the amount of fatty acids that are “burnt” within the same 24h period the exercise bout was conducted in.
Still, as Iwayama and Tokuyama point out, “statistically not significant” does not equate non-existent. You just have to take another look at the data from the Melanson study in figure 1 to see that there is a definitive trend towards increased fatty acid oxidation in the exercise compared to the control condition.
The difference between significant findings and “unreliable” trends reminds me of a previously not mentioned, yet potentially significant disadvantage of an otherwise highly reliable method to measure the total energy expenditure of human beings: The restricted number of participants in studies using indirect calorimetry with a room-sized respiratory chamber. The “trend” in the Melanson study, for example could well have reached statistical significance with a greater number of study participants; and the same obviously goes for the rest of the studies in table 1, as well. Still, as we are going to see in the conclusion, an over-reliance on statistics is not the only reason why “not working out” is not an option. Before we tackle that, I do yet want to address the last point on our check-list.
Exercise before breakfast increases 24h fat oxidation
This third and last of the initially cited assertions does not only take us back to the “breakfast problem” from the introduction, it’s also the only assertion that’s in accordance with the mainstream understanding of the role of exercise in the process of fatty acid oxidation. “Working out on empty”, “cardio in the morning” and so on and so forth – you know the whole spiel and actually you do also know the scientific explanation of why working out like this does actually work out. No idea? Well, I did provide part of the explanation in the previous paragraph, already, when I mentioned the potential impact of fasting and feasting on the experimental results.
|Gluconeogenic as most of them may be, EAAs still increase GLUT-4 and thus glucose uptake by the muscle – a true yet overlooked nutrient partitioner, so to say (read more)|
Did you know that the two essential L’s, i.e. leucine and lysine are the only amino acids that cannot be used for glyconeogenesis by the liver? Contrary to the rest of the pack, they are exclusively ketogenic and can only be transformed into ketone bodies.
In view of the built-in glucose repartitioning effect of essential amino acids (EAA), this is yet no reason to be worried about… well, unless you are on a ketogenic diet and make the standard mistake of each and every fitness fanatic to turn a high fat diet into a high protein diet without carbohydrates, so that you end up living on the little glucose your liver is able to produce without ever getting even close to real ketosis.
I see it dawns on you: It’s the sheer necessity of burning fat for fuel, in the absence of other, more readily available nutrients like carbs, or glucose the liver would generate from proteins or aminos, for example. So, in the course of your workout you are actually burning more fat than you would if you had breakfast before hopping onto the treadmill, bike or elliptical, but what about the time thereafter?
As the data in figure 2 tells you, there is no difference in the following hours and – what’s even more important – the total energy expenditure was identical – 2594kcal/day vs. 2589kcal/day in the before and after breakfast trial, respectively. In addition to that, a detailed analysis of the unpublished study by Shimada et al. the above data was taken from, does also show that
- working out before breakfast reduces the energy expenditure in the time before lunch — over the whole period the subjects burned about 500 kcal less, when exercise was performed before breakfast
- working out before breakfast burns more glycogen and increases non-oxidative carbohydrate storage during / after breakfast — with the carbohydrate content of the breakfast being used for glycogen repletion, this does in fact lead to another increase in fatty acid oxidation, simply because the alternative fuel, namely the carbs are not oxidized, but stored
So, 2x thumbs up for cardio before breakfast – at least in the short run and when your goal is to maximize fatty acid oxidation, but …
Is maximal fatty acid oxidation even what you should be aiming for during a workout?
I guess you will already have read between the previous lines that my answer to this question is a definitive “no”. Moreover, most of you are so clever and have been following the SuppVersity posts for so long that they could come up with their own arguments against an overemphasis of intra-, post and total 24h fatty acid oxidation, when getting lean and healthy is your goal. And probably, some of them are even identical to mine:
- Firstly, and most importantly, burning fatty acids for fuel does not equate fat loss. If you follow a real ketogenic diet (not one with tons of protein in it), you’ll burn (almost) exclusively fat, but even under these “extreme” conditions most of the fat will come from the fat you eat, while the small amount that’s actually taken from your hips, buttocks and whatever, will be restored unless you are in a caloric deficit, when your fatty acid oxidation will increase anyways.
The “Fat Loss Support Routine” from the Step By Step to Your own Workout Routine guide would be one example of how you can structure your weekly workout regimen to cut body fat.
Secondly, many of the metabolic benefits of exercise are closely related to the act of glycogen depletion. This is particularly true for the increase in GLUT-4 expression and consequent improvements in muscular glucose uptake, burning only fat for fuel during a workout is thus a questionable ideal.
- Thirdly, working out “in the zone” may burn the most fat but won’t have the conditioning effects high(er) intensity workouts have. While obese individuals and people who have been sitting around their whole lives will see improvements in their VO2max (and in the long run their heart-health), anyone who is not totally unconditioned misses out on the structural changes in the musculature, and as you’ve learned on day one of the SuppVersity Exercise Science Week adipose tissue, as well.
In short, the importance of burning fat for fuel is so overrated that exercise prescriptions that are based on the paradigm of maximal fatty acid oxidation are at least suboptimal for health, fitness and physique purposes. Some people, I guess, would probably even go so far to say that they do more harm than good. I for my part leave it up do you to decide whether you join sides with my carefully worded or the more extreme version of this conclusion, or – and this would be your good right – to wholeheartedly disagree with both of them.
- Ballor DL, RE Keesey. A meta-analysis of the factors affecting exercise-induced changes in body mass, fat mass and fat-free mass in males and females. Int J Obes. 191; 15: 717-726.
- Bielinski R, Schutz Y, Jéquier E. Energy metabolism during the postexercise recovery in man. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;42: 69-82.
- Dionne I, Van Vugt S, Tremblay A. Postexercise macro-nutrient oxidation : a factor dependent on postexercise mac-ronutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr69: 927-930.
- Donnelly JE, Smith BK. Is exercise effective for weight loss with ad libitum diet? Energy balance, compensation and gender differences. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005; 33: 169-174.
- Henderson GC, Fattor JA, Horninig MA, Faghihnia N, Johnson ML, Mau TL, Luke-Zeitoun M, Brooks GA. Lipolysis and fatty acid metabolism in men and women during the postexercise recovery period. J Physiol. 2007; 584: 963-981
- Hill JO. 1992. Physical activity and energy expenditure pro-ceedings: national task force on prevention and treatment of
obesity. Physical activity and obesity conference – NIDDK,
- Iwayama K, Tokuyama K. Exercise in a metabolic chamber – Effects of
exercise on 24 h fat oxidation. J Phys Fitness Sports Med. 2012; 1(2):
- Melanson EL, Sharp TE, Seagle HM, Horton TJ, Do-nahoo WT, Grunwald GK, Hamilton JT, Hill JP. Effect of exercise intensity on 24-h energy expenditure and nutrient oxidation. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 1045-1052
- Shimada K, Yamamoto Y, Iwayama K, Nakamura K, Ya-maguchi S, Hibi M, Nabekura Y, Tokuyama T (unpublished observation).
“Fasted Cardio & Beyond – Optimal 24h Fatty Oxidation: How It Works, Why It Works & Why It Still May Not Be Worth It” is replublished article from suppversity.blogspot.com